{"created":"2023-06-19T09:16:06.963968+00:00","id":644,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"76831b90-488a-4633-a1a6-c686b7efee20"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"644","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"644"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:aichi-pu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000644","sets":["194:41:130"]},"author_link":["1032","1031","1030"],"item_1_biblio_info_14":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2007","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"22","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"39","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"紀要. 言語・文学編"}]}]},"item_1_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(日)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"大森, 裕實"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_1_creator_7":{"attribute_name":"著者名よみ","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"オオモリ, ユウジツ"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1031","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_creator_8":{"attribute_name":"著者名(英)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"OHMORI, Yujitsu","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1032","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_description_1":{"attribute_name":"ページ属性","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"P(論文)","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_description_12":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"The aim of the present paper is to make a persuasive interpretation of the transition of lexical meanings of the three prepositions: wip, mid, and against, through a revision of the model presented in Ohmori (1997) which tentatively explained the semantic rivalry among them. This newly revised model is appropriately prepared to describe the process of shifts in the semantic cline of the prepositions in details. On the basis of added linguistic data from MED and the Helsinki Corpus, this study reveals the linguistic fact that the preposition mid [+proximity] disappeared in the last half of the 14th century, which leads to the exclusively dominant prevalence of the preposition wiδ (wip) and the reformation of the semantic domains on the lexical scale: at one extreme the preposition against (